We've profiled coffee, cocoa, rubber, wood and soy so far. Palm oil brings back a theme from our recent piece on legal permits versus satellite reality — except here the paper trail in question isn't a government permit, it's a voluntary industry certificate that consumer brands increasingly treat as sufficient proof on its own.
Why palm oil is regulated
Palm oil accounts for roughly 60% of global vegetable oil exports, produced almost entirely in two countries. Rapid plantation expansion across Sumatra, Kalimantan and, increasingly, Papua has made it one of the most visible drivers of tropical deforestation of the past three decades — associated with peatland drainage, habitat loss for orangutans and other endangered species, and some of the earliest and most sustained NGO campaigns of any agricultural commodity.
A shrinking, concentrated trade
Unlike every other commodity in this series, EU palm oil imports are in clear decline — down from roughly 2.8 million tonnes in 2022–23 to under 2 million tonnes in the most recent reporting period, a fall driven partly by EUDR itself and partly by separate EU biofuel policy changes that have excluded palm-oil-based fuels from renewable energy quota credits.
Indonesia and Malaysia have traded the top position over the past two years as Indonesian volumes fell faster than Malaysia's; historically, the two together with Thailand supplied around 80% of EU imports. On the receiving end, the Netherlands remains the leading hub — serving both onward distribution and domestic biofuel production — with Italy the largest importer of physical volume for direct use.
Not just big plantations
It's tempting to treat palm oil as a purely industrial-scale commodity, similar to soy. That's only half true. Smallholders manage 41% of Indonesia's planted oil palm area and 27% of Malaysia's, together accounting for roughly 35–40% of global output. Company-owned "nucleus" estates — the plantations tied directly to a mill or refinery — generally already have geolocation data in usable form, according to Indonesia's own palm oil industry association. The smallholder share is a different story: limited digital tools, incomplete land titles, and polygon boundaries that, where they exist at all, were rarely collected with EUDR in mind.
When certification isn't proof
Palm oil has the most mature voluntary certification infrastructure of any EUDR commodity — the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), alongside Indonesia's mandatory ISPO and Malaysia's MSPO schemes. A rigorous academic assessment found RSPO certification genuinely effective, cutting the deforestation rate by roughly a third compared to uncertified land. But the same study found that, on average, certified plantations had already lost nearly all their forest cover by the time certification arrived — by 2015, certified areas held less than 1% of the forest still standing inside Indonesian oil palm concessions overall. Certification measurably slows deforestation going forward. It does very little to answer what happened before the certificate was issued.
Nearly 70% of 2025's deforestation linked to industrial oil palm expansion in Indonesia was concentrated in Papua, as the expansion frontier shifts away from more developed regions. Separately, a 2021 complaint alleging undisclosed corporate relationships between RSPO-certified and uncertified companies expanding on peatland — centred on First Resources and other businesses linked to the Fangiono family — was dismissed by the RSPO Secretariat in 2025, drawing strong criticism from environmental groups.
A separate 2024 field investigation found deforestation inside Sumatra's protected Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve — habitat for one of the last populations of Sumatran orangutans, tigers and elephants coexisting in one place — had quadrupled between 2021 and 2023 despite the area's legal protection, prompting Nestlé and Procter & Gamble to open sourcing investigations after being named as potential downstream buyers.
A precision requirement that outruns its own risk map
Here's a technical detail specific to palm oil's compliance discussion that's worth understanding on its own terms. EUDR requires geolocation coordinates precise to six decimal places — roughly 11 centimetres of accuracy. But the risk-screening layer most operators check those coordinates against, Hansen-based global forest change data, has a native resolution of about 10 metres, closer to the precision of four decimal places. Indonesia's palm oil industry association has pointed out this mismatch directly: the extra two decimal places of required precision add real collection cost without adding anything the underlying risk map can actually resolve.
Asking for sub-metre precision and then checking it against a 10-metre map doesn't make the answer more accurate. It just means two of those six decimal places are there for a standard the verification step can't use.
This isn't an argument against precise coordinates — a correctly collected six-decimal point is still more useful than a rounded one for plot identification, ownership disputes, and any future higher-resolution screening layer. It's a reason to be honest about what precision is actually buying at each stage of the process, rather than treating "more decimals" as automatically safer.
Where this leaves the fit assessment
Palm oil splits cleanly in two. Large nucleus estates, already digitised and mill-linked, look like Brazilian coffee farms in our first post in this series — a segment where the raw geo-data problem is largely already solved. The smallholder share — over a third of global production — looks much more like Ethiopian coffee cooperatives: fragmented, under-documented, and exactly where structural geometry validation earns its keep. The certification gap adds a second, separate layer worth flagging honestly: a validated polygon and an RSPO certificate answer different questions, and neither one substitutes for the other.
For palm oil, our value concentrates in the smallholder segment specifically — not the large nucleus estates that already have their data in order. And it's worth being precise about what precision itself is for: a correctly structured six-decimal coordinate matters for identifying the right plot, even where the current generation of free risk-screening data can't yet use all six decimals of it.
Next in this series: cattle — the last of the seven, and structurally the hardest, because the animal moves between farms in a way none of the other six commodities do.
Trade figures are drawn from European Commission trade data as reported by Biofuels International and Renewable Carbon News (2025–2026). Certification research is drawn from Carlson et al., PNAS (2018), and Mongabay/EIA coverage of RSPO enforcement (May 2026). The precision-resolution point is drawn from GAPKI's "The Importance of Location Information for Global Palm Trading" (October 2025). Smallholder figures are drawn from industry traceability guidance sources citing Indonesian and Malaysian plantation registries.
← Back to Blog